|
|

|
|
Rodney District Council
CEO's email "inaccurate and condescending"
A 'standard
letter' sent by Rodney District CEO, Rodger Kerr-Newell to chemically sensitive
Residents has raised a storm of protest. Writing on
behalf of
Mahurangi Landcare Group
and others,
chairman
Alex Rodgers,
considered the
letter
"disturbingly inaccurate and condescending."
While accepting
that others could be responsible for this misinformation he believed it
important for Rodger Kerr-Newell
to know the
total facts.
Alex Rodgers replied: "Thank
you for you reply dated 13 May 2008 (we only received it on 19 May) relating to
future spray control of our district. To be honest I found your letter
disturbingly inaccurate and condescending.
"We are very glad that public
concern has led to a more stringent regulation of agrichemicals in the type of
chemicals used but this can only be advantageous if the council is prepared to
listen to the concerns of affected residents and not be influenced totally by
the propaganda and other misinformation that seems to always block the facts
when dealing with the council on these issues..
"To set the records straight Rodger
council did not as you state carry out trials with Organic
Interceptor in 2005 that I am aware of
– but
a group of concerned residents commissioned an independent scientist to do so in
2003. This was led and paid for by myself and my wife. Up until now the council
has insisted that it has never seen the results. Details can be provided.
|
|
"You state that these trials
pointed to Interceptor being five times more expensive and less effective than
other products you currently use.
Please show me any result which backs this statement because this
is absolute rubbish!
I arranged this trial, had an independent expert carry it out and produce
totally unbiased results which were given to RDC. It eventuated that, when
applied as per manufacturers recommendations by the appropriate equipment and in
the correct season, it was extremely effective against weeds and the difference
in cost was minimal if at all. Unfortunately the contractors that RDC has seen
fit to use seem determined to undermine its effectiveness and continually use it
in such a way that effectiveness is reduced because it is applied incorrectly.
"Nobody is arguing against
protecting our asset, the roadway, this has to be done but not
at the expense of our health.
The continual damage caused by the heavy lorries carrying building supplies to
various locations along the road by far outstrips any damage caused by weeds.
The Interceptor spraying has been successful along most of the road and there
does not appear to be any substantial regrowth. In the same period maintenance
to the holes and other damage to the tarmac, caused by heavy rain and heavy
traffic, has not been as successful and there are a number of areas where
further maintenance is required and that has little to do with weed growth.
"When you say that people who have
adverse health effects from spraying or are opposed to the use of chemicals can
sign an agreement with council to maintain their own road frontages this just
proves to me that you have very little knowledge of the health problems
encountered by hundreds of residents. We do not object to chemical sprays
because we have nothing better to do. We object and have gone to the expense of
running a trial and giving the council a viable alternative because we care
about our family ’s
health and our environment. I always understood this was also a council
priority?
"Short term reactions to
chemicals include nausea, diarrhea, headaches, loss of sight, aversion to bright
lights and sound, lethargy and achy joints whilst long term effects can be
extremely serious and incapacitating to the point where peoples jobs and entire
families can be affected. After having been a victim of chemical sprays for
years I can confirm empathy for those it affects. It is very unpleasant!
"Your last paragraph discusses the
options you feel we have. If we do not spray our section or frontage but the
neighbour does, the spray drift still affects us and our properties. (Please
refer to the Act on spray drift for legal requirements) At our last meeting with
Graeme Andrews I also asked him what dispensation the council would give as
there is a cost to doing this and the council saves time and money. I was told
no compensation. |
|
|
|
Group Letter
to Residents from CEO, dated 13 May but emailed a week later 2008 read:
spray programme
Thank you for your recent
correspondence regarding the Rodney District Council’s spray programme.
Public concern has led to a more
stringent regulation of agrichemicals and changes in the type of chemicals
used. Newer products are more effective at targeting specific vegetation and
present little or no hazard to the environment and the community.
The Council carried out trials with
Organic Interceptor in 2005 and again in 2007, however these trials pointed to
Interceptor being five times more expensive and less effective than products we
currently use.
In Rodney weed spraying is limited to
the road edge, around traffic signs, edge marker posts and concrete edges of
footpath. This protects community assets and improves road safety.
People who have adverse health effects
from spraying or are opposed to the use of chemicals, can sign an agreement with
Council to maintain their own road frontages, in accordance with Council
standards. Those residents with more severe medical conditions can arrange to
be contacted personally before spraying is carried out in their area. As you
will know this information is available on the Council website.
I trust this clarifies the issue and
thank you for taking the time to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Rodger Kerr-Newell
chief executive |
|
"You also state that those residents with more severe medical conditions can
arrange to be personally contacted before spraying is carried out in their area.
Please Rodger explain to me how that benefits them? Do they get totally
inconvenienced and just move out for the period of spraying and stay with
friends or relatives or maybe pay for a motel? This is assuming that the weather
is right and the contractor actually comes when they originally intended or do
so they just stop breathing because if they do neither the spray drift will be
everywhere for them to inhale including in their drinking water, on their lawns
for the children and pets to tramp through the house and ruining their gardens.
"Rodger this is serious! This is
why some years ago I personally surveyed Mahurangi West Rd in its entirety and
presented the council with a petition from virtually all residents wanting a
stop to toxic spraying. This is the only way to ensure we do not get affected.
Conclusion and Solution
"Rodger I accept that
your subordinates and not yourself, may be responsible for this misinformation
and I believe it is important for you to know the total facts.
"If Organic Interceptor is used as intended it does
work effectively, it does not harm residents and it is cost effective. On this
note, because of the lack of maintenance on our roads between arguments about
what chemicals to use each time we have got the road to a position whereby it is
under control and lesser amounts of organic spray can be used." It seems
unbelievable that "the council has again decided that it wants to revert to the
original dangerous chemicals that have been used before.
"Both Mahurangi West Rd and Krippner Rds have been
controlled by Interceptor and mowing now for some (10) years now and we request
that this method continues.
"I will be very happy to meet you so we can work
together towards a healthy environment that is both cost effective and
appropriate for those concerned and affected residents.
Yours sincerely
Alex Rodgers,
Chairman Mahurangi Landcare Group"
|
Please email us at
and maybe forward
information about this website to friends you know who would be interested. |
| |
Home Page
CLICK HERE
Shapenz Index Page
CLICK HERE
Would you like
to join Rodney Toxic Actions group?
CLICK HERE
Brilliant
13 year old speaks to UN
WorldofWORDS
Scientific studies show major danger in Roundup
SHAPENZ
REAL EXPERIENCES:
No confidence in "Spray-Free Register
SHAPENZ
18 year old daughter with chronic fatigue
SHAPENZ
Doctor supports chemically
sensitive patient
SHAPENZ
Endosulfan on
playing fields
SHAPENZ
CHEMICAL SPRAY INDEX
Interceptor trial with pix 2003
SHAPENZ
Biggest study on
the nutritional value of organic food to date
CLICK HERE
DDT recommended !!
Contact us
Website sponsored by
VillagePRESS
|