MAIN MENU

  Village news on the net                  Write to

FREE-ADS
advertise free

Brought to you by
Village Independent Publishers
with financial support from local businesses
PAGE NOT OPENING? VillagePRESS CLICK FOR
ADVERTISER
 
  Where to stay and be cared for -world wide Weather forecast VillagePRESS
health and environment
SHAPENZ
.
SOCIAL
lighter things
VISIT
Rainbow Valley Farm
LIST OF NZ MPs  VillagePRESS
Furniture
Maker
Country phone codes
Baby Store World
Times
Beauty
 Specialist
Currency converter
DICK SMITH
OREWA and

WARKWORTH
"VILLAGE" GROUPS
SHUTTLEBUS Healthy Living
Lifestyle
Surveyors Planners Land Development Consultants REPAIRS  Video  Microwave TV
PUHOI
KENNELS
Rental cars
Garage asset protection
Bio-degradable
paints and oils
HORSE HIRE
Holiday Camps FARMSTAY
WATER PUMPS TV AERIALS
Join  Writers group Garden Revival
FOR YOUR  ADVERT NZ general
info
To
contact us
COFCAL Developments for a Better World Ltd  
   
Philosophy and ethics - who can write and who is responsible  
   
Existential press - what does this mean??  


An horrific story of animal cruelty ...
...which could have been a seriously injured child, has been reported to VillagePRESS.

Gin traps are again being sold in some districts, but no instructions and legal requirements accompany those sales.

There is a movement to stop this but it seemed likely that “some child will have to get hurt before this ban is across NZ,” an SPCA spokesman told us.

While serrated jaws continue to be illegal, restricted use of plain jaws is permitted by some local authorities.

Our informant said he was asked by a work colleague to call into the colleagues’ Lifestyle Block home while he went on holiday. He had a “house swap” with a Wellington family they did not know very well. Perhaps he could "make sure all was well.”

When he called the first time, one of the children said there was a hedgehog in a trap down the farmlet. “I was racing to work and really didn’t register what the youngster had said. At the weekend I called again after work three days later, the boy said the hedgehog was still alive. And it was; caught by all four feet.”

      ANIMAL WELFARE ACT

4 Traps & Devices

PROVISIONS IN THE ACT

Part 2 of the Act contains specific provisions concerning the use and inspection of traps and devices. Through an Order in Council mechanism, traps and devices can be declared to be prohibited or restricted (section 32) after consideration of certain criteria (section 33). An order may contain provisions regulating the sale or use of a restricted trap or device (section 32(4)). The Act also spells out the obligation to inspect traps that are set for the purpose of capturing alive a mammal, bird, reptile or amphibian (section 36).

WHY PROHIBIT OR RESTRICT TRAPS & DEVICES?

The ability to prohibit or restrict traps and devices is needed to deal with traps and devices that pose a high animal welfare risk. Some traps, such as steel jawed leg hold traps, and some devices, such as electro-immobilisers, may cause an animal considerable suffering and intervention may be warranted.

FISHING DEVICES & TRAPS EXCLUDED

Section 32(2) excludes traps or devices used for fishing. This is for reasons related to a lack of alternative methods, social and economic implications, and difficulties with enforcement.

OBLIGATION TO INSPECT LIVE CAPTURE TRAPS

The Act includes an obligation to inspect traps where the purpose is to capture alive a mammal, bird, reptile or amphibian (section 36). Inspection of kill traps is not required as it can reasonably be expected that the animals trapped were killed instantly. Where there is a concern with the effectiveness of a “kill” trap in terms of welfare considerations, this can be addressed through the ability to prohibit or restrict the use of traps.

Section 36 requires that traps must be inspected within 12 hours after sunrise on the day after the day on which the trap was set. For example, if a trap is set on Tuesday and the sun rises at 6am on Wednesday morning, it must be inspected before 6pm on Wednesday. Any live animal found in the trap must be removed, properly attended to or, without delay, killed.

Failure to inspect a trap in accordance with this provision is an infringement offence and attracts a $400 infringement fee (section 162 (4)(b)(i)). However, if a person chooses to contest the infringement notice served on them by an Inspector, the offence may proceed through the court system and the maximum fine rises to $1,200.

 See http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/files/regs/animal-welfare/act/awguide.pdf

 


Photo provided by Informant

“I put it out of it’s pain immediately, but was appalled. The gin trap was also just staked on an obviously used path and could well have been stepped on by a kid, or catch a hand or fingers….”

Must not be set within *150 metres of  house

VillagePRESS has found that there are regulations requiring ‘careful use’ which also bans the setting of such devices within *150 metres of any house. Our informant said that, using Google Earth, he could see that nowhere within the property would be permitted and that other houses would also be closer to the trap site. [*one hundred and fifty metres- not fifteen hundred as originally reported - our error, thanks 'Informant'-: Ed].

Any such trap is legally required to be inspected within 12 hours of sunup the following day.

 Our informant asked VillagePRESS not to be identified and was concerned about what to do as the colleague who had set the trap was someone he had to work alongside. Any ideas from a reader to suggest how he could make the workmate repeating this cruelty, would be interesting.-- PER Managing Editor    

Animal Issues

MAIN MENU

other issues INDEX